Log in

No account? Create an account
Scheherazade in Blue Jeans
freelance alchemist
The Invisibility of the Female Geek 
20th-Apr-2011 03:37 pm
Jean Grey
So, like I mentioned in an earlier Link Soup, Spencers is selling Marvel superhero pajama sets.

I find this awesome. Because they are basically Underoos, and Underoos are awesome. I have been hoping for an Underoo renaissance for years. Y'all have no idea. I seriously talk about Underoos a lot.

The thing I am "erf?" about here is the media coverage.

io9: "Marvel superheroine pajamas are a great gift (if you want your wife to divorce you)".

Geekologie: For The Ladies (But Actually For The Mens): Sessy Superhero Character Pajamas.

Both articles, I note, were written by men.

Both articles presuppose that comics are a Boy Thing. That a woman could not possibly want superhero pajamas. Your wife will divorce you? Really, io9? Really?

Because I tell you what would happen if my husband bought me those pajamas. I would be sillybouncy and quite happy. And then he would get to see me in them. All the time. (We don't have central air. Cami + panties = what I wear around the house all summer.)

That sounds like a win/win to me.

Want to know what my only problem here is? Lack of variety. I want Phoenix (green and red). Branch out to DC - I want Vixen. I want Power Girl. I want all of Heroes for Hire. I want Shadowcat.

I want Amethyst, Princess of Gemworld.

I want Wasp and Miss Marvel and Spider-Woman (not just Spider-Girl) and Batwoman, I want Storm, I want an amazing array of Underoos. I want to be a different superhero every night.

And I don't want that "for the mens", I want it for me. Because sometimes, dudes, it's not about the menz. Sometimes we just want to have fun. Fuck the male gaze, I just want to dress up like Wonder Woman because I like dressing up as Wonder Woman. And that is a valid choice.

I know more about comics than any man you know - unless that man is my husband, and in that case, we're tied. Female geeks. We exist. Is that really still news?
20th-Apr-2011 07:30 pm (UTC)
I added them all to my amazon list because I want them. They'd be perfect for around the house or visiting the boyfriend when I spend quite a lot of time not totally dressed. Plus! Geek!

I don't get it. We're not exactly invisible so why is the myth that we don't exist still so hard to get past?
(Deleted comment)
20th-Apr-2011 07:35 pm (UTC)
I would rather insist that my partner wear the plastic Hellboy fist with the PJs. At least long enough for a little photo shoot. (See also Wolverine claws, Hulk hands).

Indie comic PJs would be great too, of course!
20th-Apr-2011 07:37 pm (UTC)
But but... the only reason a woman might have to look pretty is to make men look at her! She wouldn't like looking pretty if it weren't for men!

20th-Apr-2011 07:42 pm (UTC)
Apparently it is really still news. I just added them to my wish list, too.
20th-Apr-2011 07:47 pm (UTC)
I don't think the articles are based on a (supposed) issue with gender in comics and geekdom. The heroines in the underoos are more buxom than the women who wear them, so jealousy is a factor.
20th-Apr-2011 07:48 pm (UTC)
You know Amethyst!!! Yay! It's nice to know I'm not the only one who cherishes those memories. :)

And yes, I would totally wear those pajamas even though I don't usually wear any at all. :)
21st-Apr-2011 03:41 am (UTC)
I still have every issue!
20th-Apr-2011 07:49 pm (UTC)
I'm not opposed to the idea of superhero pajamas in general, I just think the design of these is kind of gratuitous. I hate the body silhouettes - it's basically saying that no matter how small your waist is, it could be smaller. A pair of pajamas with superhero(ine) motifs that were NOT calling attention to the anatomically impossible physiques of female characters in comics could be pretty awesome, and a great gift. But I can absolutely see (as io9 is saying) how a gift of these pajamas would be less of a "hey, you love superheroes, here's some pajamas reflecting that" and more of an editorial comment on the wearer's inferior body.
20th-Apr-2011 07:52 pm (UTC)
See, I actually wrote and deleted a thing about that - should've left it in!

I think the fact that no waist could possibly be that small calls attention to the ridiculousness of comic-book physiques. I imagine that superhero PJs of this style for guys would have ridiculous Rob Liefeld muscles. I actually think the hyperexaggeration is better than mild exaggeration in this case.

But I'd buy realistic ones, too.

Edited at 2011-04-20 07:54 pm (UTC)
20th-Apr-2011 07:58 pm (UTC)
Wasp! Yay!

Also Scarlet Witch and the Monica Rambeay Caprain Marvel, because I want white and silver with the cool star.
20th-Apr-2011 08:08 pm (UTC)
The Power Girl boob window is kinda silly RL, alas.

I'd kinda like Flying Fox from Astro City, myself.
20th-Apr-2011 08:10 pm (UTC)
Oh, I'd want a screenprinted boob window. I am terribly active in my sleep; things could get ridiculous.

And yes, everyone from Astro City!
20th-Apr-2011 08:13 pm (UTC)
Unfortunately, it seems like female geeks are still news. Hell, "if you want your wife to divorce you" is a step up in the portrayal of male geeks - I'm surprised it didn't say "if you never want to get married and move out of your parents' basement."

It's a pretty sad commentary on the state of our society today that if you read anything or have any sort of hobby at all, you are automatically viewed as some sort of weirdo.
(Deleted comment)
20th-Apr-2011 10:01 pm (UTC)
I . . . WHAT?
(Deleted comment)
(Deleted comment)
20th-Apr-2011 08:50 pm (UTC)
Captain America Pimp Stein. Captain America. Pimp Stein.

Pimp Stein? Captain America? Pimp? Stein?



20th-Apr-2011 09:07 pm (UTC)
Can I have my Codename: Sailor V pyjama now? The manga's all up on Amazon and everything. IT IS TIME. FOR SAILOR V PYJAMA.
20th-Apr-2011 09:15 pm (UTC)
Or my personal favorites: Domino and Psylocke. Emma Frost was a good start, but they need to take this idea and run.
20th-Apr-2011 09:21 pm (UTC)
To geeks, no.

To marketers...yes!

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
This page was loaded Jun 21st 2018, 2:57 am GMT.