Scheherazade in Blue Jeans
freelance alchemist
Oh no you didn't. 
16th-May-2006 01:50 pm
I Hate It Here - Transmet
(Yes, I know I'm Posty McPostalot today. I'll be better tomorrow. I just am not going to sit on this one.)

Link via fiannaharpar:

New federal guidelines ask all females capable of conceiving a baby to treat themselves -- and to be treated by the health care system -- as pre-pregnant, regardless of whether they plan to get pregnant anytime soon.

Pre-pregnant.

Now, the article goes on to make the following recommendations: "...all women between first menstrual period and menopause should take folic acid supplements, refrain from smoking, maintain a healthy weight and keep chronic conditions such as asthma and diabetes under control." And, y'know, I'm for that. In that I just generally think that diabetics ought to keep an eye on the diabetes so they don't end up having to get limbs amputated. I think that's a common sense thing.

But the words "federal guidelines" and "pre-pregnant" are not just sending up red flags, they're sending out a fireworks show and a marching band.

I have been unable to obtain adequate medical care for my epilepsy because I am what they'd call pre-pregnant. As my neurologist puts it, I am a woman of child-bearing age. As such, they flat-out refuse to try me on any medicines other than the ones proven least likely to affect a fetus (read: the ones that are paying off my neurologist). Despite the fact that I have declared my belly a no-fetus zone.

My neurologist does not trust me to not get pregnant. My neurologist puts a potential fetus's potential health over my health.

And now the government wants to officially sanction that.

Oh HELL no.

I should not have to get my fucking tubes tied in order to not have seizures and/or get medication that at least doesn't have me dropping weight. (90.5 on the Craftsman's bathroom scale; even taking into account that it's a different scale from my doctor's, it's a significant enough difference that I have to look at it. I'm 89 on my scale right now. Which slips, but - still.) To get off a medication that's caused what's essentially a whole-body crash.

Pre-pregnant? Hell no. I am post-pregnant by 11 years. Pregnancy and me do not belong in the same sentence.

Screw that noise.

EDIT: When I first posted this, I was writing just for myself and my friendslist, so I didn't put in a whole lot of background. Now this post has been linked all over LJ and in DailyKos. So. Background for people who have not been reading me since the dawn of time, quick-and-dirty version: I was diagnosed with epilepsy in October 2003. My first neurologist put me on Lamictal, which caused some pretty untenable side effects, including the first 2/3 of what became a catastrophic weight loss - 50 pounds in total, to a low of 85 pounds.

She tried me on Keppra, which was worse - then gave up for the sake of the potential fetus. I switched neurologists and medications, trying Topomax and Trileptal, the latter of which (plus Zonegran) I'm still on. The weight loss continued. Uncontrollably.

There are medications that have, as their side effects, weight gain. I have begged for these medications, but been refused. Direct quote from my neurologist: "You're a newlywed. You'll want a baby." I'm a newlywed with an 11-year-old daughter and a body that's falling apart. Trust me. I do not want a baby. But my stated desires are irrelevant - I cannot get prescribed a medication that will keep me from losing weight and may control my seizures better than the one I'm on now, due entirely to increased risk of birth defects.

If you want any further information, feel free to ask; I'm not shy.
Comments 
16th-May-2006 06:10 pm (UTC)
Pre-pregnant? Hell no. I am post-pregnant by 11 years.

But it seems that the moment you gave birth, you became pre-pregnant again, yes? Anyone not pregnant but capable of being so, by their guidelines, must be pre-pregnant, yes?

By that standard, I'm already pre-voting for somebody else.

(Oh, I knew you were teeny, but 90 lbs? How do you walk around on a windy day?!)
16th-May-2006 06:27 pm (UTC)
I got down to 85.

I don't carry umbrellas on windy days. :)

And yes, I am trying Really Hard to put on and maintain weight!
16th-May-2006 06:11 pm (UTC)
OMG!

How much of this may I publically quote on my blog (with credit, of course)?
16th-May-2006 06:25 pm (UTC)
Oh, all of it; it's a public post.
16th-May-2006 06:12 pm (UTC)
If folic acid, gym memberships, personal trainers, stop smoking aids, the various medical appointments/prescriptions/etc were free and easily available/accessible for us pre-pregnant women, I may be able to tolerate this.
18th-May-2006 06:20 am (UTC)
Hear hear! If they're not going to provide the money, they can let me run my body the best way I can.
16th-May-2006 06:13 pm (UTC)
Do what now?

This is how it happens, man. Under the guise of being For Your Own Good. Insidious.
16th-May-2006 06:25 pm (UTC)
That's it. I'm just going to tell all of my healthcare providers that my tubes were tied!

"Pre-pregnant" - what a stupid phrase. By that yardstick, we're all pre-dead.
16th-May-2006 07:42 pm (UTC)
Yes! I love your logic. I'm going to remember this. Thank you!
16th-May-2006 06:43 pm (UTC)
I saw that earlier.. sigh.



Made me sick to read then too.
16th-May-2006 06:43 pm (UTC)
Typical.

In law school all the sexual discrimation suits based on "dangerous" workplace enviroments that restricted women from having those jobs based on baby making, turned out the the men were most likely to become infertile or have damaged sperm from exposures to lead, chemicals and solvents, while the women had less apparent problems.

We don't call it a Nanny State for nothing.
16th-May-2006 06:49 pm (UTC)
We Must Protect The Children!

*gag*

Thank the gods I found a doctor who would give me a tubal when I asked.
16th-May-2006 06:58 pm (UTC)
I'm pretty sure I can get a tubal if I ask (and is it not offensive that they can say no?) - not just with my health issues, but that I have a child, so I won't get the "You'll want to be a mother someday!" argument.

I don't want a tubal, though*, and I shouldn't have to get one in order to get adequate medical care.

(* Adam and I are going to evaluate things when we settle down in Boston and see how my body's doing.)
16th-May-2006 06:57 pm (UTC)
Oh. Dear. Goddess. NO!

Welcome to Giliad, where a womans only and sole purpose is to get pregnant, and everything else is second to that...

gah!

When in hell are you americans gonna wake up, rise up in revolt and throw the bums out!?!
16th-May-2006 08:58 pm (UTC)
[disgustedly] When everybody here gets it through their thick heads that "On, I like *my* representative just fine; it's everybody *else's* representative that's the problem..." keeps us from ever turning out any of the bastards.

(or Congresscritter, or President, or Governor...)

It's time to vote against our current government, in its entirity.
16th-May-2006 06:59 pm (UTC)
Everyday, it seems that we get closer and closer to The Handmaid's Tale.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Handmaid's_Tale
17th-May-2006 02:44 am (UTC)
YES. That was my exact thought when I read this post this afternoon. Especially because I'd just re-read the book...
16th-May-2006 07:08 pm (UTC)
for one, there are actually no "guidelines" basically, this is congress's way to formally accomplish nothing. They are making a formal recomendation to the public, this does not change any existing laws or legaly sanction what your neurologist is doing. What your neurologist is doing is called covering his ass. Basically, should someone want to get pregnant (or god forbid actually get pregnant) on a medication that does detrimentally affect a fetus, he can be held liable, even if he warned them. To give you an idea how crazy medical law suits can be, my grandfather was once sued by a patient that he had never even treated (the person had been treated by someone else at the same hospital as him) and his malpractice insurance chose to settle as upposed to getting it thrown out of court. Not only does that make his malpractice insurance go up, but it goes on his record. Also, its possible that any pregnancy complications they cause could be permanent conditions within the mother. In other words a person that takes the medication may never be able to have children (or atleast not unaffected ones) ever again. As for drug companies paying him off, most don't bother. He'd have to be one of the most popular neurologists in the city for it to be worth their while anyway, it would be cheaper for them to just make a better drug.
16th-May-2006 07:24 pm (UTC)
Drug company payoff comes in more forms than pure bribe money... for instance: free samples, snacks for the staff, golf outings, small gifts, and so on.

There was an article on it in - IIRC - The New Yorker a few months back, and I've actually witnessed all of the aforementioned more than once, from more than one rep.
16th-May-2006 07:18 pm (UTC)
I hope that you don't mind me speaking as a physician here; it's more because physicians are getting malpractice suits because they didn't advise women to be prepared properly for pregnancy. Secondarily, the government is taking this stance to decrease neonatal intensive care use, often due to poor habits on the mother's part prior to conception. Finally, there may be a local bias towards young women getting pregnant often; sort of a Biblical thing. But I suspect lawsuits being the primary reason.

Have you considered getting a tubal ligation? That would shut up your neurologist, once and for all.

16th-May-2006 07:28 pm (UTC)
I never mind you speaking as a physician, hon; I appreciate it. My sensors on "AAAAAGH all doctors are fucking stupid!" probably require recalibration. Just - this and a bunch of other stuff, with me and others.

I've been advised numerous times that Depakote, for example, can cause birth defects. Okay. I feel informed. I use condoms with spermicide, and I have Plan B in my purse. Why can I not have the medication?

I've considered a tubal, but

a) We're not convinced about the No More Kids Ever thing. No More Kids Right Now, certainly - but we're holding out hope that my body will settle sufficiently after some time in Boston and some med experimentation, and there are new drugs being approved all the time - I don't want to have my tubes tied now and have The Solution come around a year from now.

b) I don't want to give up that future just to get adequate medical care. I resent the hell out of that. I shouldn't have to do it.
16th-May-2006 07:27 pm (UTC)
write about this. I bet slate would be a good market. seriously -- draft a pitch? I know the managing editor there and can pass on her email. Slate likes riffing on headlines, and the angle of 'here is a practical impact this has on my life' is a great one.
16th-May-2006 07:29 pm (UTC)
*blink* Sure! Info to shadesong AT gmail.com, please?
16th-May-2006 07:34 pm (UTC)
Linked and seconded.
16th-May-2006 07:34 pm (UTC)
(here from juliansinger) I'm surprised no one has said "find a new neurologist". Admittedly, I have never dealt with neurologists, but in my experience it is possible to find a doctor who isn't an asshole if you shop around.
16th-May-2006 07:37 pm (UTC)
It is, but good specialists often have long waiting lists for new patients, or even appointments for their existing patients.
16th-May-2006 07:41 pm (UTC)
I growled about this and then linked to you, since you're an eloquent source of "this sort of mindset is already causing problems."

Feh.
16th-May-2006 07:47 pm (UTC)
Seriously, man. That pisses me off. As someone who does not intent to breed, ever, I wouldn't want my current health care being based on my not-likely, hypothetical future health. I'm not a freaking baby machine, I'm a human being. I can't imagine how you feel. Why is the government mingling in this, anyway? Don't they have anything better to do? Like, you know, handle Iraq?
16th-May-2006 08:00 pm (UTC) - Pre-breeder
I'll be labeled a pre-breeder in a couple years.
16th-May-2006 08:03 pm (UTC)
I just have to shake my head. My mother is not pre-pregnant. My mother has been cursing every month for the last 20 years that she was done breeding.

She is 52 years old, I am 30. She is in a Long Term Commited relationship with another female...
who has grandkids older than yours....

Her healthcare should in no way ever reflect the concept of her becoming pregnant again.
16th-May-2006 08:21 pm (UTC) - may not be completely well organized as I'm commenting while at work and flabbergasted
Wow, I'm really offended at this whole thing, but am particularly struck dumb by the idea that I should manage my asthma not because my health is in any way important in and of itself, but because I might potentially become pregnant some day.

Maybe our infant mortality rates would be better if we: found a way for ALL individuals to have adequate health care at reasonable prices, gave women more options to avoid unwanted pregnancies, and really assessed the correlation between poverty and infant mortality (poorer nutrition, etc).

I can control whether or not I get pregnant- there are birth control pills, and condoms, and spermicide, and any number of other items. Encouraging doctors to talk to women about birth control- absolutely. And I feel it is reasonable for my GYN to ask me each year if I plan on becoming pregnant any time in the next 12 months so that we can change my birth control and health plan- because as soon as I say no he treats me as 'not pregnant' and moves on. Treating us all as pre-pregnant drones who can't control our own actions- no way.
16th-May-2006 08:35 pm (UTC) - Re: may not be completely well organized as I'm commenting while at work and flabbergasted
I should manage my asthma not because my health is in any way important in and of itself, but because I might potentially become pregnant some day.

Well, you're not important; you're just an incubator that might push out a strapping young boy someday.

I love George Bush's America. Except not.

nd I feel it is reasonable for my GYN to ask me each year if I plan on becoming pregnant any time in the next 12 months so that we can change my birth control and health plan- because as soon as I say no he treats me as 'not pregnant' and moves on.

*nods* My primary care doc is the same way, and she prescribed Plan B for me with no objection. But there are places where you can't get a prescription like that filled.
16th-May-2006 08:27 pm (UTC)
Do you mind if I link this article and quote part of your post, including this:

My neurologist does not trust me to not get pregnant. My neurologist puts a potential fetus's potential health over my health.
16th-May-2006 08:28 pm (UTC)
In addition, I want to say, given what I've researched about the government cover up of the mercury/autism link with regards to vaccines, it is clear that they actually have no regard for children whatsoever, and that this is yet another way to attempt to gain control over women and their bodies.
16th-May-2006 08:34 pm (UTC)
Ok, your story pisses me off. And it takes a lot to really piss me off.

Isn't there some way-- though it SHOULD Be UNNECESSARY -- that you could consult legal aid and have a document written up that says in essence "Yo, doc, if I do conceive I'm aware of the risks to my potential fetus and I won't sue you for birth defects because I am a thinking human person. Now make with the good epilepsy pillz, STAT."

Because that's just CRAP... that a potential fetus comes before a real person who is a mom, a wife, a friend.

Preconception care. Ugh. Just because you CAN, doesn't mean you WILL.

Are fathers being asked to avoid liquor, drugs, the dangers of tighty-whities, bicycle seats, smoking, and anything else that might harm the sperm? Or to set aside a certain amount of their income as pre-child support? Because, you know-- if they are not snipped, and are of sexually mature age, they are pre-parental too and half the pregnancies are unplanned, so ya gotta be RESPONSIBLE, boys. The street better go both ways. Or better yet-- don't construct the road at all.

Fucksicles.
16th-May-2006 08:54 pm (UTC)
Are fathers being asked...

Hey, don't say that so loudly! They might get ideas... =)
16th-May-2006 08:53 pm (UTC)
I linked to this on my LJ, too.

I am admittedly anti-abortion, but I feel that as it's legal, there's nothing really I can do about it, except police my own self, and that's how it should be. I can't make someone's decisions for them, and unless I'm sitting in thier skin, I can't judge them. *Shrug*

But this SCARES me. It makes me angry and sad and scared because I don't want someone dictating to me how I handle my body. I'm 28 and I don't plan on having children. I don't want to be viewed as a "baby factory" even before I've made the decision to have children.

Every time we make a step forwards, we seem to take about twenty steps back.
18th-May-2006 03:11 am (UTC)
There's a strange statistic regarding abortion, in particular - supposedly, over half of the women who have abortions believe it is morally wrong.

This suggests to me that the great flaw in our country is fear - because there is nothing that will overrule a person's morals like fear. Women are treated so very badly if they have children out of wedlock, their parents and the world assure them that it will and must RUIN their lives.....

Something is wrong, and I feel sure this attitude is part of it. Somebody out there, many somebodies, regard women as property, and the women are too frightened and often too young to handle it.
16th-May-2006 08:54 pm (UTC)
i smell religious right all over that shit.
16th-May-2006 08:58 pm (UTC)
I just have to say that your icon is fabulous.
16th-May-2006 09:09 pm (UTC)
I found your post via rhiannonhero

The Bush administration and it's cheering secion, the Radical Right, will do anything to take away a woman's sovereignty over her own body.

I am now forty, when I was 34 I had my first mammogram because I am obese and because the lumpy breast tissue that runs in my family makes self-exams rather confusing. I had to swear up down and sideways that I did not want children, that childbearing was not the remotest possibility, and even then, the tech made me wait while a Doctor signed a waiver so I could get the mammogram.

You are right, we should not be forced to have surgery in order to obtain the adequate medical care any man would receive without question, but it seems that's the way it's going to end up.
16th-May-2006 09:26 pm (UTC)
I had to swear up down and sideways that I did not want children, that childbearing was not the remotest possibility, and even then, the tech made me wait while a Doctor signed a waiver so I could get the mammogram.

Just to get a mammogram? That's nuts...

I remember having to beg for an X-Ray once last year - I was just about ready to have my period, and they didn't want to X-Ray me because I might have conceived and might not know I was pregnant. I was using condoms and spermicide. I had to *fight* with these people.
Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>
This page was loaded Sep 23rd 2014, 10:23 pm GMT.